If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were far from antennas.
However, what is a safe distance from a cell tower revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. safe distance from cell tower include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.