Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from a 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could result in many possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).


The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally,  safe distance from cell tower  and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.