If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While https://writeablog.net/areakite9/how-long-away-from-a-new-5g-mobile-tower-system-for-anybody-who-is but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.